The Target Dot on the Scanners' Long, Covered Table

This article elaborates my preceding articles, How long did the imaginary burst waterpipe delay the ballot-counting? and The Scanners' Long, Covered Table.

This new articles' analysis uses Poliitikot's YouTube video titled NEW VIDEO EVIDENCE! - Georgia election hearing II part 1.

You can enlarge the below screen-shots by clicking on them.

=======

If you go to 26:45 on the YouTube video, you will see the situation at 08:21 a.m. on the morning of Election Day, November 3. Watch the upper-right quadrant.

Shaye Moss, the Black woman with blonde braids, pulls a long, black table from the quadrant's lower-left corner and then pushes the table into a special place. She pushes from one end of the table. At the opposite end from Moss is a round, white dot. In the middle of the white dot is a black crosshairs.

Moss pushes the end of her table to the end of another long table. The two tables are placed end-to-end, essentially forming one doubly-long, aligned table. The white dot is only on Moss's table, but the dot can be seen simultaneously in the upper-two quadrants at 27:09 of the video (at 08:22 a.m. on November 3).

The two tables can be seen in a composite image made by Yaacov Apelbaum.

I speculate that the dot was affixed onto the table in order to place the table in optimal view of the camera. The dot was supposed to be above a particular spot on the floor and to be visible at the lower edge of the video's upper-right quadrant. .  

The table was supposed to be the most easily observed object in the entire video. If any questions ever arose about the scanners' unobserved work late on Election Night, then their work could be observed afterwards on the video. The workers would clearly be seen putting their un-scanned ballots under the table at 10:30. Then the workers would be seen taking the ballots back out from under the table at 11 p.m. in order to scan them in the middle of the night. 

Watching the video would debunk suspicions that the workers put any fraudulent ballots into the process. 

======

I speculate that the deception included the following key elements:

* Between 6 and 8 a.m., an imaginary flowing-water incident was concocted.

* Shortly before 8:30, the two long tables -- especially the scanners' table -- were placed so that they were prominently visible in the cameras' views.   

* Sometime during the morning or day, the camera was turned off for one minute, while four boxes of fraudulent ballots were placed under the table.

* In the early evening, journalists were told that the morning's flowing-water incident had delayed the vote-counting by at least two hours. 

* At 10 p.m. everyone was told that counting would be suspended from 10:30 p.m. until 8:30 a.m. 

* A few minutes before 10:30, the scanners packed up their un-scanned ballots into four boxes and put the boxes under their table. 

* While everyone else left right after 10:30 p.m., the scanners loitered until 11 p.m.

* At 11 p.m. the scanners went to their table and pulled the four boxes of fraudulent boxes from under the table. 

* The scanners scanned the four boxes of fraudulent boxes until 1 a.m. 

* Shortly before 1 a.m., the scanners were warned that Republican observers were coming back to the room. The scanners quickly put everything away and departed a few minutes before the observers arrived.   

* During the following few days, the scanners gradually scanned all the ballots in the four boxes that remained under the table. 

If the entire video is watched now, the one minute when the four boxes of fraudulent ballots were placed under the table will not be noticed. The video will have to be examined to find the short interruption in the recording.

=======

Will Brad Raffensperger ever explain the water incident?